[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374





------- Additional Comments From mpg@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-18 04:42 EST -------
>Don't add static libraries files. If you want then
>- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
>check files installed under %{_libdir}/xulrunner-%{version}%{prerelease}/sdk

To clarify, these are not just static versions of the dynamic libraries. They
are required if you want to link against lixpcom.so, at compile time or at
runtime. That's why I thought I'd put them in the -devel package.

http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XPCOM_Glue

That said, should I use a -static package even in this case?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]