[Bug 1279176] Review Request: isis - Framework to access a large variety of image processing libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279176

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > - Why is -applications and -tools seperate?
> -applications requires very big dependency: muParser

muParser is 120k RPM, 369k installed. I wouldn't bother with the split, but if
you want to ... OK.

- license is OK (GPLv3+)
- license file is present, %license is used
- license is present for any subpackage combination
- latest version
- requires / provides look mostly correct (see below)
- builds and installs OK
- applications run
- rpmlint:

isis.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.9-1 ['0.7.9-2.fc24',
'0.7.9-2']
Please fix.

isis-devel.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/isis/CoreUtils/application.hpp
isis-adapter-itk-devel.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/isis/Adapter/itkAdapter.hpp
isis-adapter-itk-devel.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/isis/Adapter/itkAdapter_impl.hpp
You should ping upstream about that.

Issues:
isis-adapter-qt4-devel should have:
Requires: isis-adapter-qt4{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

isis-adapter-itk-devel likewise.

There seems to be a problem with one of the plugins:
$ isisdump
...
ImageIO:warning["io_factory.cpp":202] Could not load library
"/usr/lib64/isis/plugins/libisisImageFormat_png.so":"/usr/lib64/isis/plugins/libisisImageFormat_png.so:
undefined symbol: png_set_longjmp_fn"

This seems to be a problem with libpng version. According to
http://stackoverflow.com/a/21588966 libpng >= 1.4 has this function, but
libisisImageFormat_png.so links to libpng 1.2. And you have BR:libpng12-devel.
Please investigate!

OK, some trivial fixes and some bugfixing is needed, but nothing to hold up the
review. Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]