https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I've added /usr/x86_64-nacl ownership. I think chromium broke on the softlinks. Would rather just keep it as is, where I know it works. This toolchain (nacl-binutils, nacl-gcc, nacl-newlib) is only ever used to make x86_64 and i686 builds. I'm not entirely sure if it will work on i686 systems, but it definitely isn't useful anywhere else. We disable nacl/pnacl on i686 right now. For these packages, ExclusiveArch is correct, because we never care/need for it to build anywhere else, and pnacl/chromium wouldn't use it even if we did. The other nacl toolchain (nacl-arm-$foo) is only ever used to do arm builds, but because of how pnacl works, it needs this to be built for x86_64 (and i686 and arm in theory). Since we're disabling i686 nacl/pnacl right now and I haven't got enough good liquor to work on chromium ARM yet, ExclusiveArch is correct there too. I think I can figure out how to build the nacl/pnacl stack for arm without nacl, but thats a big TODO (Tomas Popela added some fixes to pull in the ffmpeg arm bits, so thats a big part out of the way). Chromium upstream doesn't support ppc/s390 as far as I can see, so there's no sense in going through the normal process for that. I've updated the comment in nacl-binutils to provide a more accurate summary of the situation. New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils-2.24-4.git1d8592c.fc23.src.rpm New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review