https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276081 --- Comment #8 from Ngo Than <than@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #7) > rpmlint looks ok now. > > The only issue remaining is the last one from comment #5: > Please note that it is impossible to install these texlive-extension > packages on CentOS or in an epel-7 mock chroot as Centos hasn't updated > texlive-kpathsea-lib: > > Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch > (/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch) > Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >= > 2:2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.centos > Available: > 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.i686 (base) > texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7 > > Manually installing texlive-kpathsea-lib.x86_64 into the mock chroot > resulted in a different error that shows the real issue: > Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch > (/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch) > Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >= > 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.centos > Installed: > 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64 (@base) > texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7 > > in the mock chroot: > # rpm --eval %dist > .el7.centos > > So there's a mismatch between the provides of official EPEL packages and the > requirements in mock builds if the packages use %dist in the > Provides:/Requires: fields. > > I think we need to waive this issue although it is quite unfortunate. The > package review guidelines only require that the package builds in mock, not > that it is installable ;-( > > i don't think it's a bug in texlive-extension, but rather in rpm macro. This issue does not appear if you build in koji build enviroment. > comment #2 is now valid for all other subpackages. The 5 mentioned are fixed > now and use the release tag. All others have Release 1%{dist} hardcoded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review