https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276081 --- Comment #7 from Karsten Hopp <karsten@xxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint looks ok now. The only issue remaining is the last one from comment #5: Please note that it is impossible to install these texlive-extension packages on CentOS or in an epel-7 mock chroot as Centos hasn't updated texlive-kpathsea-lib: Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch (/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >= 2:2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.centos Available: 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.i686 (base) texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7 Manually installing texlive-kpathsea-lib.x86_64 into the mock chroot resulted in a different error that shows the real issue: Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch (/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >= 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.centos Installed: 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64 (@base) texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7 in the mock chroot: # rpm --eval %dist .el7.centos So there's a mismatch between the provides of official EPEL packages and the requirements in mock builds if the packages use %dist in the Provides:/Requires: fields. I think we need to waive this issue although it is quite unfortunate. The package review guidelines only require that the package builds in mock, not that it is installable ;-( comment #2 is now valid for all other subpackages. The 5 mentioned are fixed now and use the release tag. All others have Release 1%{dist} hardcoded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review