https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716 --- Comment #6 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for looking at this. I do use the system libnacl for i686. Unfortunately, the system libnacl is not compiled with -fPIC, so I have to fall back to the bundled nacl for x86_64 and ARM. Should I file a bug report with the nacl package? The problem with system libuv, is that it is the wrong version (incompat API), and a different wrong version on EL6 (although much closer). The tools don't belong in libexec, IMO. They are not used by cjdns. They are CLI tools. There are two versions, python and nodejs. Both have libraries. lib, not libexec seems appropriate for those libraries. Why didn't I put the CLI tools directly in /bin? Because several of the python and nodejs tools conflict - e.g. peerStats. So I put them all in lib and symlink an arbitrary selection to /bin. Note that moving just the commands to libexec would entail lots of code changes - the libraries are found by relative path. I would prefer to drop EL6 support rather than deal with sysvinit files. Can we leave the EL6 support as caveat emptor? If not, I'll just delete EL6 support for Fedora. EL7 works fine with the systemd units. I changed the passwd comment (useradd) to "End to end encrypted IPv6 mesh". Or were you looking for something along the lines of "user id for cjdroute"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review