[Bug 1107127] Review Request: procenv - Utility to show process environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127



--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #20)
> (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #19)
> > So, I'm assuming you guys are interested in co-maintaining?  Who is going to
> > be the POC?
> 
> James, since he wrote it, though it's currently moot.  I don't specifically
> want to maintain it, but I'd like to see it available as an answer to 
> "Why does my program fail under the batch system?".

Well, looking closer, it does not appear that James is currently a packager. 
Is that correct?  James - do you want to become one?
> 
> > James -
> > 
> > - No need for %defattr(), please remove
> 
> I'd subsequently done that and modified the perl-JSON-PP condition per the
> previous comment.  (I think this preceded EPEL7.)  Is it still relevant with
> whatever "check" does?

I think so.

> > - Why are you running autoreconf?
> 
> It no longer ships with autotools output, though I think it should.
> (I realize you may not want to keep that in the repo, and I assume you'd
> have to when using github, but omitting it probably makes builds less
> reliable.)

Ah, I get it now.  James - you really want to produce proper releases with
"make dist" and upload the tarballs.  I assume github still allows for that.

> The packaging rules say the source URL should be of the form
> https://github.com/jamesodhunt/procenv/archive/%commit.tar.gz
> and then you need
> 
> %setup -q -n procenv-%commit

Actually, they don't and this was clarified a while back.  But I prefer:

Source0:       
https://github.com/jamesodhunt/procenv/archive/%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

though perhaps this will change with uploaded tarballs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]