Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From jakub@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-08 12:09 EST ------- Re: comment #25 ln -s npwrapper.so %{buildroot}%{nslibdir}/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.so command, no matter in which cwd you run it, will be always a circular symlink. Perhaps something changes this symlink during %post or you have changed it yourself, but I don't believe npwrapper.so in your binary rpms is anything but circular symlink. Try rpm -qplv nspluginwrapper*.rpm | grep npwrapper.so Re: comment #23 does your nspluginwrapper really change the /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin/ directory? What's the reason for that? In 32-bit firefox there is no reason for wrapping a 32-bit plugin (the shell script actually says it should be used directly when target is the same as host) and if say /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin/libflashplayer.so is owned by some other rpm, e.g. rpm -V of that package will fail miserably if nspluginwrapper changes it. Also, limiting nspluginwrapper to flash is IMHO a bad idea, there are many other plugins. And ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 is a bad idea as well, this is needed also on ppc{,64}, sparc{,64}, ia64, s390x, ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review