Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From caillon@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-08 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > BTW, is this what Christopher Aillon was referring to in Comment #12? If it > were, it would also have been best we agree to substitute the original review > request with it, rather than simultaneously creating another implemetation. Yes, it was. I'm not trying to hijack the bug and apologies if it came off that way. We were working on this in parallel. I own the browser stack and I was unaware that anybody else was doing this (someone should have notified me earlier) until Warren cc'd me after we'd gotten this to the point it was basically done. I meant to convey that the approach in this package review was broken and I would deny review based on that. The package we uploaded fixes those major issues. I don't see why we need a new review for that. Again, sorry for any confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review