https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258572 --- Comment #13 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #12) > This is intentional, because %dist tags in changelog entries will force > maintainers to modify their specs each time they are merging from different > branches. When making a backport this is useful as one sees on which branch the change being backported has been made. Missing %dist tag is a disadantage. I have no idea what you are talking about. > Nobody with a little experience in Fedora would apply $dist tags in > changelog entries and ... almost nobody has done so for > 10 years. I have started using %dist tags in gdb.spec after 2 years of its maintenance and I find it useful during backporting for another 7 years. I have removed that %dist it in libipt.spec to be packaging guidelines compliant, it shouldn't be heavily maintained package and after all it is not the only thing I disagree with in general. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review