https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874 --- Comment #6 from Jens Lody <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Snippet of fedora-review: <snip> Rpmlint ------- Checking: libmaxminddb-1.1.1-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm libmaxminddb-devel-1.1.1-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm libmaxminddb-utils-1.1.1-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm libmaxminddb-1.1.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm libmaxminddb.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.1-1 ['1.1.1-2.el7.centos', '1.1.1-2.centos'] libmaxminddb.x86_64: W: no-documentation libmaxminddb-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib libmaxminddb.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/maxmind/libmaxminddb/releases/download/1.1.1/libmaxminddb-1.1.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 403: Forbidden 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libmaxminddb-debuginfo-1.1.1-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- libmaxminddb-debuginfo.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib libmaxminddb.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.1-1 ['1.1.1-2.el7.centos', '1.1.1-2.centos'] libmaxminddb.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmaxminddb.so.0.0.7 /lib64/libm.so.6 libmaxminddb.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. </snip> The unused-direct-shlib-dependency-warning can be removed, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues?rd=PackageMaintainers/#unused-direct-shlib-dependency After removing this, I got a private-shared-object-provides-warning for the main-rpm (for some obscure reason, I did not get it before), but it is most likely an issue with fedora-review/rpmlint see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253917 Nothing is shown with rpmlint directly or when running rpm-qp on the package(s). The only-non-binary-in-usr-lib is also a positive, I think, it's common to have just a link to the versioned so-files in /usr/lib[64] . The incoherent-version-in-changelog should be fixed. Not sure about the no-documentation warning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review