https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874 --- Comment #5 from Jens Lody <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jan Včelák from comment #3) > Thank you for a quick check. > > - I replaced %doc with %license. > > - License field should refer to the content of binary RPM, not source RPM > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License: > _field]. I've verified that the packages contains only content licensed > under Apache License 2.0. > I'm not sure if the mixed source licensing scenario kicks in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > - I would like to keep the Group tag as I need the package in EPEL as well. > No problem, it's just a should ! > - Even though rpmlint reports 403, the Source0 works. Checked with wget and > web browser. > > Updated spec: > https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/libmaxminddb/1.1.1-2/libmaxminddb. > spec > Updated SRPM: > https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/libmaxminddb/1.1.1-2/libmaxminddb-1. > 1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm Works here from browser also, maybe a github hickup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review