https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427 --- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #16) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14) > > (In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #13) > > > [!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > > > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > > > Guidelines. > > > license.txt does not appear to be Artistic 2.0 and states "You cannot > > > redistribute this test version." > > license.txt still states "You cannot redistribute this test version". It's an obsolete file. Removed. > > > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > > Several licenses found by licensecheck. Here's the list: > > > ... > > > > Fixed. > > licensecheck still lists several files that are not Artistic 2.0 or GPLv2+. Updated; please, read comment above License tag. SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/COPASI/COPASI.spec SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/COPASI/COPASI-4.16-0.13.20150817git3bc4e9.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review