https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305 --- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #14) > I don't understanding the packaging applied here: > > epix requires epix-static (which is a virtual package in epix-devel) > epix-devel requires epix > => a circular dependency between epix and epix-devel > > If headers and static lib are strictly required at _runtime_, it would have > been more elegant to include everything in a single package. Just like it's > done for compilers and similar tools. > > What does it do with the static lib and the headers at runtime? > > [...] > > On x86_64, "dnf install epix.i686" and "dnf install epix" differ. The former > pulls in epix.x86_64 - possibly because of a broken dep somewhere. Indeed, i have rearranged sub-package's dependencies recently. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/epix.git/tree/epix.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review