https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- I don't understanding the packaging applied here: epix requires epix-static (which is a virtual package in epix-devel) epix-devel requires epix => a circular dependency between epix and epix-devel If headers and static lib are strictly required at _runtime_, it would have been more elegant to include everything in a single package. Just like it's done for compilers and similar tools. What does it do with the static lib and the headers at runtime? [...] On x86_64, "dnf install epix.i686" and "dnf install epix" differ. The former pulls in epix.x86_64 - possibly because of a broken dep somewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review