Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 ------- Additional Comments From eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-02 01:42 EST ------- Thank you for the review. I will make the changes you have requested. Why should the release be "0.1build55" rather than "0.1bld55"? The author names the source file and changelog entries with "bld" and "Bld", but not "build". It is not clear to me where the naming guidelines require me to submit the package for review with the release number of 1. The guidelines say: The release number (referred to in some older documentation as a "vepoch") is how the maintainer marks build revisions, starting from 1. I have followed that guideline, and the package I submitted for review was the eighth build revision. I'm not disputing whether the build revision of the package initially submitted for review should be 1, bur rather suggesting that the documentation is not clear on this point, and perhaps it should be made more explicit. When I submit my next build revision, I'll set it to 1, though I dislike the loss of build traceability. Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review