https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911 --- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11) > Though, I don't see any reason why "beta" target is needed, do you mean to > put in Release? Version 0.6.4 is official with no beta hint at all, the zero > in front of version should be enough identification for any beta thought of > upstream. I think that the "beta" builds everything, including the plugins (you do this in separate step) and debug information. Not sure what and if there is any other difference, but I doubt that. (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12) > FTBFS for arch i686: It builds in Rawhide and F21 at least [1], but the F22 build is broken ATM (it is actually Rawhide build, have to wait till Lazarus lands in updates for F22 :/ ). [1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/vondruch/doublecmd/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review