https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #10) > Last time I discussed the .zdli with upstream, they insisted that we should > distribute also the .zdli, although we have possibly debuginfo available and > that we should use the "beta" target for build. I know that it seems to be > duplicated information, on the other hand, there is code in DoubleCmd, which > can consume the .zdli and should be able to provide some better crash > reports for end users as well for upstream. Okay, fixed. Thanks for this information. Though, I don't see any reason why "beta" target is needed, do you mean to put in Release? Version 0.6.4 is official with no beta hint at all, the zero in front of version should be enough identification for any beta thought of upstream. * Tue Jul 21 2015 Raphael Groner <> - 0.6.4-2 - distribute zdli files for crash reports - avoid duplicated documentation and binaries - improve shell logging SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd.spec SRPM: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd-0.6.4-2.fc22.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10424505 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review