[Bug 1225229] Review Request: light-locker - A simple session-locker for lightdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225229

Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |MODIFIED



--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Christoph Wickert from comment #11)
> Raphael, your fixes for the desktop file don't seem correct:
> 
> 1. First you fix NotShowIn and then you use sed to remove the key, so your
> patch becomes useless.

Yeah, this is currently b0rken, as mentioned in the comments.

> 2. You will also need this patch:
> https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/commit/1c23309c2f6a

Thanks.

> Please also configure with
> 
> --enable-lock-on-suspend=on
> 
> instead of
> 
> --enable-lock-on-suspend=yes
> 
> because the Red Hat security response team wants machines to be locked after
> waking up from suspend (see bug 614608 and bug 632978). "on" means we do it
> by default whereas "yes" means just having the option to do it, but that
> requires changing the command line in the desktop file that starts
> light-locker.

Sure. Thanks a lot for these hints.

Next update will include both fixes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]