[Bug 1225229] Review Request: light-locker - A simple session-locker for lightdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225229

Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Raphael, your fixes for the desktop file don't seem correct:

1. First you fix NotShowIn and then you use sed to remove the key, so your
patch becomes useless.

2. You will also need this patch:
https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/commit/1c23309c2f6a


Please also configure with

--enable-lock-on-suspend=on

instead of

--enable-lock-on-suspend=yes

because the Red Hat security response team wants machines to be locked after
waking up from suspend (see bug 614608 and bug 632978). "on" means we do it by
default whereas "yes" means just having the option to do it, but that requires
changing the command line in the desktop file that starts light-locker.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]