[Bug 1224265] Review Request: udiskie - Automounter for removable media

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224265



--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues generally:
* You can use -print and -delete as the options for find
  to log and remove the disallowed files:
- find %{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib} -name '*.exe' | xargs rm -f
+ find %{buildroot} -name '*.exe' -print -delete
With that, you need also only one line to find in both py2 and py3 folders.
You should do that removal early in %prep, but I do not know if install fails.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
     licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/polkit-1/rules.d,
     /etc/polkit-1
=> This is handled in PolicyKit. So you must add Requires: polkit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package

[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/icons/hicolor
     (hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos),
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/actions(hicolor-icon-theme),
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos)
=> Please remove them from %files, hicolor-icon-theme takes care of that.
=> Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
=> see above.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[!]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in udiskie
=> Please fix.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files.
=> List manpage without %doc, it is a separate file and has nothing to do with
documentation folder.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[ ]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
     Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
=> I do not understand this. The hint is wrong.
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[?]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
=> see above.
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python-
     udiskie , python3-udiskie
[!]: Package functions as described.
=> several open issues that currently prevent fully functionality.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
=> Use 'nstall -p' or 'cp -p' instead.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: udiskie-1.2.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python-udiskie-1.2.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python3-udiskie-1.2.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          udiskie-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
udiskie.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unmounting -> mounting,
miscounting, unstinting
python-udiskie.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automounter -> auto
mounter, auto-mounter, mounter
python3-udiskie.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) udisks -> disks, u
disks, Saudis
python3-udiskie.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automounting -> auto
mounting, auto-mounting, automating
udiskie.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unmounting -> mounting,
miscounting, unstinting
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.9 starting (python version = 3.4.2)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
Mock Version: 1.2.9
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.9
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 831, in <module>
    main()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 653, in main
    run_command(options, args, config_opts, commands, buildroot, state)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 708, in run_command
    commands.init()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/backend.py", line 123, in
init
    self.buildroot.initialize(**kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/buildroot.py", line 84, in
initialize
    self._init(prebuild=prebuild, do_log=do_log)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/buildroot.py", line 128, in
_init
    self._setup_devices()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
84, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mockbuild/buildroot.py", line 442, in
_setup_devices
    os.symlink("/proc/self/mounts", self.make_chroot_path('etc', 'mtab'))
FileExistsError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/proc/self/mounts' ->
'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/etc/mtab'



Requires
--------
python-udiskie (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    PyYAML
    gtk3
    pygobject3
    python(abi)
    python-docopt
    udisks2

python3-udiskie (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gtk3
    python(abi)
    python3-PyYAML
    python3-docopt
    python3-gobject
    udisks2

udiskie (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    /usr/bin/python3
    config(udiskie)
    python3-udiskie



Provides
--------
python-udiskie:
    python-udiskie

python3-udiskie:
    python3-udiskie

udiskie:
    config(udiskie)
    udiskie



Source checksums
----------------
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/u/udiskie/udiskie-1.2.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
075b967360d69b6e9a06a5b93b36b2a9181367b269d305710b96c38b245ac340
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
075b967360d69b6e9a06a5b93b36b2a9181367b269d305710b96c38b245ac340


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1224265
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]