https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.micheal@xxxxxxx> --- Try pointing the fedora-review tool at this ticket: fedora-review -b 1213065 It evaluates the "Spec URL:" and "SRPM URL:" lines, downloads the latest packages, performs local test-builds and many checks related to the packaging guidelines. > please remove "_v1" postfix after download The better choice would have been to practice increasing "Release" for each package update: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FrequentlyMadeMistakes | Increase the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid | confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have | older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between | the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't | change. > License: BSD A modified 3-clause BSD that adds a specific requirement for documenting changes in the README and the source files. Not really a hurdle for the current patch but can be easy to miss. > cc -O -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.8\" -c -o buffer.o buffer.c https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags rpmlint: hexer-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review