https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224385 --- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to David Tardon from comment #11) > [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must > be documented in the spec. > > I think you should list concrete files/dirs. At least that is how I have > always understood it. The ASL, which covers most of the code, can be handled > by a blanket statement, something like: "All the code is licensed under ASL, > except for ..." > > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/xml, > /usr/share/licenses > > Sorry, I missed this one previously... I think /usr/share/licenses should be > owned by package filesystem, though. Indeed. /usr/share/xml is now co-owned. I left the same release number: Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/percolator/percolator.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/percolator/percolator-2.09.0-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review