https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193923 --- Comment #6 from Morten Stevens <mstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5) Here is the latest mbedtls.spec file: https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/mbedtls/mbedtls.spec https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/mbedtls/mbedtls-1.3.10-1.fc23.src.rpm > - Consider using %make_install instead of the open-coded make install ... fixed > fedora-review complains: > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided > in the spec URL. > Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/tmp/review- > rc/1193923-mbedtls/diff.txt > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL The URL has been changed to: Source0: https://tls.mbed.org/download/%{name}-%{version}-gpl.tgz > - Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if > present. > Note: Package has .a files: mbedtls-devel. Does not provide -static: > mbedtls-devel. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries new subpackage added: mbedtls-static > - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 40683520 bytes in 1423 files. > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation new subpackage added: mbedtls-doc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review