[Bug 1193923] Review Request: mbedtls - polarssl package renaming process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193923

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Yeah, package looks good. @Christopher: would you mind if I finish the review?

- Consider using %make_install instead of the open-coded make install ...

fedora-review complains:
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
  in the spec URL.
  Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/tmp/review-
  rc/1193923-mbedtls/diff.txt
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
  present.
  Note: Package has .a files: mbedtls-devel. Does not provide -static:
  mbedtls-devel.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 40683520 bytes in 1423 files.
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]