https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #31 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #30) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #24) > > - License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license > > - Upstream URLs are not reachable yet for me at this time. > > - There is no code GPLv2+ excluding 'flamp-2.2.02/src/include/gettext.h' > > License should be 'GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+'. > > Ok, after going back and re-reading I understand what you're saying, but per: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility > > When you use sources that are both GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ the combined work is > covered under GPLv3+ which is the whole point of the "+". I understand; note#7 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#compat-matrix-footnote-7) says: > 7: LGPLv2.1 gives you permission to relicense the code under any version of > the GPL since GPLv2. If you can switch the LGPLed code in this case to using > an appropriate version of the GPL instead (as noted in the table), you can > make this combination. Original LGPLed code seems redistributed with GPLv2+; so i think you can use GPLv3+ combination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review