Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-23 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. You might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL and the other odd license? > Not a blocker. I'll send upstream a note and see if he'll put a COPYING or the like in the source distribution. Along with a manifest of which files are under which license. The source code files which are GPL say so in the boiler plate at the top of the .c files. > 2. What parts of the code are under the odd MIT-like O'Reilly license? > It might be good to list them. Also, I can't find mention of this license in the > code > anywhere. Where is it stated? The .c files that are under the MIT-like license from O'Reilly say in the header at the top of the file that they are copied from Mastering Algorithms in C by Kyle Loudon. It gives the ISBN number and a link to the book's page on O'Reilly. I wondered about what license these files were under so I downloaded the original examples .tgz from O'Reilly where these files came from and read the license in there. So no, the license is not specifically mentioned in haproxy itslf, but the source code that is from the Loudon Book is duely noted. All in all, each .c file in haproxy says where it came from, who wrote it, and if its under GPL it states that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review