[Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2007-05-21 22:48 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
See below - License(GPL)
See below - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
45a66691aa3b22996862e3e5bac4289c  haproxy-1.2.17.tar.gz
45a66691aa3b22996862e3e5bac4289c  haproxy-1.2.17.tar.gz.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. You might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL and the other odd license?
Not a blocker.

2. What parts of the code are under the odd MIT-like O'Reilly license?
It might be good to list them. Also, I can't find mention of this license in the
code
anywhere. Where is it stated?

3. rpmlint says:
E: haproxy non-standard-uid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy
E: haproxy non-standard-gid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy

These can be ignored.
Not a blocker.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]