Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-23 10:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > It works just fine. Ah, I misunderstood. I told you, my python is not nearly so developed as my PHP or even my C++. :) > > No. One of the main tasks of a package maintainer is to make sure their packages > integrate well with the rest of the distribution; anyone armed with google can > roll their own RPMs, but that does not make them Fedora maintainers. Cluttering > up /usr/bin with pointless symlinks is bad. Agreed, and I was not proposing to use symlinks, I was proposing to move the test_ script there directly. > Also, in general your average end-user isn't interested in unittests; I'm not > even convinced they should be shipped in the binary RPM... but putting them > under %docs at least gives intereste people (aka developers) the option of using > them, I suppose. Which is why I put it in %doc in the first place (which would still be my preference). I was thinking I could put it in put with a note detailing how a user could get the test script to work, namely copy it and the main script to the same place and run. Given the Python shipped in Fedora, it should be working from the get-go once the rpm is installed. Hence my use of the word 'extraneous in Comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review