https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210941 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #3) > Do you think that test_isrcsubmit.py could be covered by GPLv3+ or does it > need another license (Public Domain or CC0)? I find upstream's wording a bit > confusing. I personally think this is a moot issue as we're not distributing test_isrcsubmit.py as part of the binary packages nor does it contribute the binary package contents in any way. > If that is true, do you know if there is a "proper" way of > dealing with it, e.g. renaming the one or the other? I couldn't find > something relevant in the packaging guidelines. I don't know if it's in the guidelines, but to me the proper way is to follow upstream, and if someone's interested enough, ask upstream to drop the *.py suffix from the executable as it becomes an issue if the script is sometimes implemented in something else besides python. I don't personally care that much. > > "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %install is not a matter of distro version but > > whether redhat-rpm-config is installed or not. > > Could you please elaborate on that a bit Not sure if there's actual documentation about it anywhere, but you can compare the output of "rpm -E %__spec_install_pre" with and without redhat-rpm-config installed on the distro version of your choice. See also (at least on F-20): $ grep -A 4 __spec_install_pre /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros > Is it possible to build rpms and not have redhat-rpm-config installed? It certainly is. Note that the dependency that pulls in redhat-rpm-config in rpm-build on recent Fedora versions is on system-rpm-config, not redhat-rpm-config in particular (r-r-c just provides it, but it can be satisfied by another package providing it). And some active distributions don't even have that dependency, such as CentOS/RHEL/EPEL 6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review