https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261 --- Comment #48 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #47) > > 1) > > Note that .la files are libtool archives and are not related to static libs. > It's just Fedora's guidelines where both .a and .la are covered in the same > section. > Yes you are right. I mixed the sentence when I wrote it. > > > 2) > > Nothing in the guidelines suggests that. Packagers are free to put the > scriptlet sections where they want. *If* there's something to consider > related to scriptlet sections, avoid comments in the spec file below such > sections. The comments would be included in the scriptlet body, which > becomes a problem when the script is not executed via /bin/sh (e.g. the > ldconfig scriptlets). > I will still prefer this cosmetic change for easier readability. > > > %license COPYING-LGPLV3 > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3HowToUpgrade > > Please approach the upstream author about the second sentence in the section > of the FAQ. The current comment in the file "COPYING" is just lame. I suppose you mean here the effective license should be mentioned in COPYING right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review