[Bug 1182261] Review Request: libabigail - Tool for constructing, manipulating, serializing and de-serializing ABI-relevant artifacts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261



--- Comment #47 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> ---
> 1)

Note that .la files are libtool archives and are not related to static libs.
It's just Fedora's guidelines where both .a and .la are covered in the same
section.


> 2)

Nothing in the guidelines suggests that. Packagers are free to put the
scriptlet sections where they want.   *If* there's something to consider
related to scriptlet sections, avoid comments in the spec file below such
sections. The comments would be included in the scriptlet body, which becomes a
problem when the script is not executed via /bin/sh (e.g. the ldconfig
scriptlets).


> %license COPYING-LGPLV3

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3HowToUpgrade

Please approach the upstream author about the second sentence in the section of
the FAQ. The current comment in the file "COPYING" is just lame.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]