https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210004 Bahram Maleki-Fard <kbon@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbon@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Bahram Maleki-Fard <kbon@xxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review request, and thanks for the reviews! I'm maintaining upstream :) > This library (including the examples) seem to be LGPL licensed. Do you know > why upstream has included LICENSE.GPL? I think you can drop it. Because it is required to do so. Quote: "Please note that, since the LGPL is a set of additional permissions on top of the GPL, it's important to include both licenses so users have all the materials they need to understand their rights." (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review