https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476 --- Comment #10 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- There is an updated spec and srpm now avaliable taking into account Mukundan's comments. Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/sslh/sslh.spec SRPM URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/sslh/sslh-1.17-1.fc21.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jhogarth Koji scratch builds have been carried out against this: F21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9380211 F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9380212 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9380216 Going through fedora-review against my own package there are three warnings in rpmlint: * This is how it is named upstream for the summary on the developer's site. sslh.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Applicative -> Application, Multip licative * The protocol/application name is tinc (http://www.tinc-vpn.org/) sslh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tinc -> tin, tic, inc * The main binary, and systemd unit, is for sslh. The binary sslh-select is an optional one someone can elect to use that does not fork and is less tested (https://github.com/yrutschle/sslh). sslh.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sslh-select -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review