https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693 --- Comment #17 from Paul Colby <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- > The -examples package now needs an explicit dependency on "pcp" Done :) > The explicit dependency on "pcp-libs-devel" would be safer ... if it were arch-specific Done :) I see now that this is a requirement (well, stated as "should" at least) in the official Packaging Guidelines too (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires_2). > It doesn't build with latest GCC 5 in Rawhide Fixed. Now builds, tests, etc on Fedora 22 Alpha 3. Once again, I've updated the Spec and SRPM files linked at the top. You can see all of the changes (not many) since the previous review Spec and SRPM files at: https://github.com/pcolby/pcp-pmda-cpp/compare/5fde84b0f1468a8d7f4266e8a910b4eb74f13086...440a0fd3aa4182b037cf04818d8210513959d2ac Thanks again! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review