https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186389 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> --- We talked a bit in IRC about epel6 probably not getting a python3 package so whether the python versioned macros are needed. I'm willing to approve and the epel steering committee can decide if they want to make that a divergence from Fedora Guidelines for epel6 and below (or even epel7 depending on whether a python34 package gets created there). Other problems have been fixed. I noticed two things that can be fixed after import: * I messed up when I told you what the license line should be. It should actually be: License: (MIT and Python) and (BSD or MIT) * Should add "This package is a compatibility version of the package for EPEL. " to the main package %description as well as the doc package %description Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review