https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723 --- Comment #17 from Jan Pokorný <jpokorny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > So I wonder if it is better to follow what you advised (and expose > new risks, e.g., with dangling symlink for whatever reason) or to > be a bit liberal and just change the path http://www.linuxbase.org/betaspecs/fhs/fhs.html#usrshareArchitectureindependentData agrees about a static nature of the files, so I should rather use the symlink variant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review