https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723 --- Comment #16 from Jan Pokorný <jpokorny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Well, as I said now bash completion files are to be installed under > %_datadir, which means that this file is not expected to be modified. > If you want to modify, it must create symlink which points to some files > under %_sysconfdir (usually under %_sysconfdir/%name), and modifying > file must be done for files under %_sysconfdir. Great point as my temporary solution was just change the path and this "/usr/share should be static" hadn't occured to me. On the other hand it's not entirely true (after fresh yum update): $ find /usr/share -mtime -1 | grep cache > /usr/share/mime/mime.cache > /usr/share/mime/text/cache-manifest.xml > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache > /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache So I wonder if it is better to follow what you advised (and expose new risks, e.g., with dangling symlink for whatever reason) or to be a bit liberal and just change the path. > - Well, (while I no longer remember when the decision was made), there > is already a consensus that "|| :" after %check must be removed. Main issue is how hard is to find anything on this topic (search engines are not really ready for such queries). My original reasoning was that I'd like to be compatible with the current major release of RPM where possible (4), but it seems that there never will be a proper major 5 (see rpm5.org project I don't understand too much) and this is the respective source/change I followed: http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=max-rpm.git;a=commitdiff;h=12e31f963b5273494183eec10466f775ffd04c89#patch3 But I checked specs of several high-profile and will remove that tail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review