[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869



--- Comment #20 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> I didn't merge this change, because I am currently unsure about its benefit.
> I think it is good config for the start, and it's probably good it's present
> in the sysconfdir. It has noreplace, so it can be freely tuned. I think
> typical approach when running benchmark is to get initial config, run
> benchmark, analyze results, tune config, re-run benchmark, etc., until one
> is satisfied with the results.
> 
> This is my personal opinion, but feel free to share your opinions.

OK!  I guess you use it differently.  It's not used with fixed input here, e.g.
as
a convenient way of stressing a single node of varying memory size.  Also, it's
not obvious to me that it fits the definition for files in /etc in the FHS.

Obviously that's not important and it's irrelevant without a proper review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]