Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-08 19:28 EST ------- Looks like a new version of this just came out today, but I don't think it will bother the packaging. I found it odd that the test suite is installed as documentation. I don't suppose it hurts anything and I suppose the code could be instructive. * source files match upstream: 7be7a6d69644dd2580d552b01ffcb388e82d203804090bb003b0728dcfbcb8d1 Class-C3-XS-0.02.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. O latest version is 0.03 * BuildRequires are proper (including new Perl bits) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: XS.so()(64bit) perl(Class::C3::XS) = 0.02 perl-Class-C3-XS = 0.02-1.fc7 = perl >= 0:5.008_000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.28 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. (documentation is a bit larger than the rest of the package, but then we're only talking about 20k). * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review