https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146662 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2) > (In reply to Michal Srb from comment #1) > > Tarball contains license texts for ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and spec file > > reflects this in license field. However, all source files contain following > > header: > > > > * java-libpst is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify > > * it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published > > by > > * the Free Software Foundation, either *version 3* of the License, or > > * (at your option) any later version. > > > > So either license text in tarball (and subsequently license tag in spec > > file) is incorrect or license headers in source files are. > > > > Upstream should decide which version of LGPL license they want to use. > > report the problem @ https://github.com/rjohnsondev/java-libpst/issues/23 Fixed #23 via https://github.com/rjohnsondev/java-libpst/commit/07af7b8c2311d1f7f4a045300df7d8dbb0124c4e. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review