https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 --- Comment #22 from Ingvar Hagelund <ingvar@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #21) > Ingvar, > > if you don't mind, we'll finish the review. Sure, that was my point. I've not been able to prioritize this for months, so it's better you guys take over. > If you like, you can become co-maintainer if that works for you. Thanks, but no, thanks. My primary target was to wrap up Vagrant, and this subpackage was just a requirement. When Vagrant upstream changed so much that packaging with Fedora standards became non-trivial, I left that to more seasoned packagers. I don't feel ownership to this package, so it's better off in your hands. > * Wrong license > - As Ingvar pointed out, the license is a bit tricky, but I'd say that the > last license mentioned for 1.10.0 is LGPLv3 [1]. I believe that it was > relicensed, although the conditions of the relicensing are not very > clear :/ > > * License file > - Have you asked upstream to include the LICENSE file? For clearity, the gem included doc/content/license.html should probably be removed or replaced with text referring to the (missing) LGPLv3 LICENSE file then :-) Ingvar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review