https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #24 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- 1) Right its optional but I recommend to have fontconfig files for fonts. Though this font is not covering any non CGL languages (only Latin) so it can be optional but I will say add generic names rule file. You can use this font style as fantasy in fontconfig. 2) Just by looking into this line %{_font_pkg} %{_fontdir} one can easily say its going to give duplicate dir installation warning. Let's check on koji for this and I can see in build.log this warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/labiryntowy recommended way is %_font_pkg *.ttf -f %{fontconf} 3) Marwin, I observed either something is broken in this packaged font or in ttname package itself. But I have ran ttname on some fonts in fedora and it worked well. It helped to fix copyright as well as license metadata in font files but for this font its failing. Maybe you want to report this to upstream and get the font metadata fixed as given in fonts guidelines. Also, When you do Ctrl+Shift+f in fontforge and click on "TTF names" in left side, you will see on right side there is no license or license url field so indeed that information is missing. Check this -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Correcting_the_metadata_with_ttname 4) I have recently added appdata metainfo file to many fonts packages in F21 and F22. This package also need to add metainfo file. I know this is not again in Guidelines but Richard Hughes wants this. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203394.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review