https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #23 from Lubomir Rintel <lrintel@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #21) > (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #12) > > (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #11) > > > Lubomir, > > > First, this package is not following Fonts packaging guidelines. > > > > Could you please be more specific? > > > > 1) We need to have a fontconfig file. This one only need to cover generic > names rule. Please point me to the part in the guidelines that mandate this. I have not been able to find if it's mandatory however I found indication that it might be optional: "fontconf is the optional fontconfig ruleset..." [1] [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template > 3) Incorrect usage of %_font_pkg macro. > > I have not checked what the package submitter has checked in git yet as > there is no approved updated srpm here to verify. There is, and it seems correct to me. (In reply to marwin from comment #22) > > > 2) I think as per guidelines this font need to fix its metadata. There is > > no license text, neither in source nor in font file itself. There is a > > example given on the guidelines page on how to do this. Copyright contains > > license information which looks incorrect and need to be fixed. > > > Please open this font in fontforge Ctrl+Shft+F > in licence: > "Licencja SIL open font. Autor Jacek Szewczyk" > You can convert ttf into fontforge text format and read it too. It's not the full text though. Jacek, please add a file with _full_ license text (e.g. to opis.txt). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review