https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 --- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- Just two or three points here - Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: llvm34-doc : /usr/share/doc/llvm34-doc/examples/BrainF/BrainF.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages ---> This is fine. - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel ---> I think this is fine. There is Buildrequires: python, Is that what is triggering this? ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. ---> Present in -libs subpackage. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "ISC", "Unknown or generated". 2381 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mukundan/ownCloud/pkg_reviews/llvm34/1161014-llvm34/licensecheck.txt ---> This is fine. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. ---> About this - Can you use the %license macro for this since this is a new package anyway? This is not updated in packaging guidelines yet. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/llvm34 ---> This is fine, I think. llvm34-libs owns this directory. [?]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. ---> Please remove -O3 from the flags or add a note. I would prefer to remove this. However, since llvm spec does not say why this was added (I am sure there was a good reason), I am just confused. Thoughts? [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 686080 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: llvm34-static. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in llvm34-doc , llvm34-libs , llvm34-static ---> Discussed in the previous review. No issues. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: llvm34-3.4.2-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm llvm34-devel-3.4.2-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm llvm34-doc-3.4.2-3.fc22.noarch.rpm llvm34-libs-3.4.2-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm llvm34-static-3.4.2-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm llvm34-3.4.2-3.fc22.src.rpm llvm34.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llc-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-ar-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-stress-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-nm-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lli-child-target-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-bcanalyzer-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-tblgen-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opt-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bugpoint-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-symbolizer-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-cov-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-rtdyld-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lli-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-diff-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-objdump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-mcmarkup-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-mc-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-as-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-readobj-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-dwarfdump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-link-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-extract-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-size-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary macho-dump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-dis-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-ranlib-3.4 llvm34-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-config-64-3.4 llvm34-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation llvm34-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation llvm34.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment llvm34.src:124: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib ---> This complaint is for the sed line in the spec file. No issues. sed -i.orig 's|/lib /usr/lib $lt_ld_extra|%{_libdir} $lt_ld_extra|' configure llvm34.src:178: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/gcc/%{_target_cpu}*/*/include) ---> This, I guess has to be done that way. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8121349 llvm34.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch20: clang-3.4-arm-hard-float.patch llvm34.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch22: pr12586.patch 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 33 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint llvm34 llvm34-static llvm34-devel llvm34-libs llvm34-doc llvm34.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llc-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-ar-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-stress-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-nm-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lli-child-target-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-bcanalyzer-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-tblgen-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opt-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bugpoint-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-symbolizer-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-cov-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-rtdyld-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lli-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-diff-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-objdump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-mcmarkup-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-mc-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-as-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-readobj-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-dwarfdump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-link-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-extract-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-size-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary macho-dump-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-dis-3.4 llvm34.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-ranlib-3.4 llvm34-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation llvm34-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llvm-config-64-3.4 llvm34-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 30 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- llvm34 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libLLVM-3.4.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libffi.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) llvm34-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) llvm34-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): llvm34-devel(x86-64) llvm34-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/sbin/alternatives libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libffi-devel libffi.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++-devel libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) llvm34(x86-64) ncurses-devel rtld(GNU_HASH) llvm34-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig config(llvm34-libs) libLLVM-3.4.so()(64bit) libLTO.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libffi.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) llvm34-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): llvm34 Provides -------- llvm34: llvm34 llvm34(x86-64) llvm34-static: llvm34-static llvm34-static(x86-64) llvm34-devel: llvm34-devel llvm34-devel(x86-64) llvm34-libs: config(llvm34-libs) libLLVM-3.4.so()(64bit) libLTO.so()(64bit) llvm34-libs llvm34-libs(x86-64) llvm34-doc: llvm34-doc Unversioned so-files -------------------- llvm34-libs: /usr/lib64/llvm34/BugpointPasses.so llvm34-libs: /usr/lib64/llvm34/LLVMgold.so llvm34-libs: /usr/lib64/llvm34/libLLVM-3.4.2.so llvm34-libs: /usr/lib64/llvm34/libLLVM-3.4.so llvm34-libs: /usr/lib64/llvm34/libLTO.so Source checksums ---------------- http://llvm.org/releases/3.4.2/llvm-3.4.2.src.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 17038d47069ad0700c063caed76f0c7259628b0e79651ce2b540d506f2f1efd7 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 17038d47069ad0700c063caed76f0c7259628b0e79651ce2b540d506f2f1efd7 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1161014 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review