Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-02 15:09 EST ------- hi Mamoru I think I got some conflict info on version number and changelog, I hope Jens to help me clarify these issues. Seriously, I think either way works perfectly for me, and both are reasonable scheme as long as we are consistent in the future updates. ok, I updated the spec/srpm one more time Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-7a.src.rpm diff: http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?action=browse&diff=1&id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec&revision=10&diffrevision=9 I removed Conflict/Requires (I copied these from other examples, but I personally don't think they are necessary either, plus that x11-font-wqy-bitmapfont is not a Fedora package after all); the [-f ] conditions were removed and added dependences in Requires(post) and Requires(postun); added -m0755 for font directory as Yijun suggested; used (-,root,root,-) as default attributes. For version numbering scheme, I used the upstream number this time, following Mamoru's suggestion. To accommodate the requirements in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes I used a letter "a" after the release number to avoid confusions. Similarly, this tag is used in the changelog block. The next update will have 7b and so on. How does this sound to you? and Jens? by the way, I saw my Fedora account still shows "unapproved" for cvsextra, I am wondering if there is something else I should do to get access. thanks, looking forward to feedbacks. Qianqian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review