https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > we can't do it in one of the already available vdsm-* packages, > because we want them also be signed as noarch The "BuildArch" tag can be set per subpackage. Package "vdsm", for example, currently builds arch-specific packages as well as "noarch" packages. Creating a separate empty src.rpm for that only creates overhead. > What's wrong with using libname? Why define %{libname} and not use it anywhere? And if %libname were to be used in the spec file, why not simply use %name instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review