https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479 Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(danken@xxxxxxxxxx | |) --- Comment #8 from Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This package helps vdsm to avoid adding requirement for packages which related to specific arch (in that case - dmidecode). when vdsm contains such requirement in the spec, we must sign vdsm package as arch specific. while requiring this meta package, vdsm and all its subpackages can be signed as noarch, except the vdsm-arch-dependencies. we can't do it in one of the already available vdsm-* packages, because we want them also be signed as noarch Hope I clear enough.. What's wrong with using libname? The idea behind is clear and already discussed (hope Dan can provide link about it). main goal - to avoid having arch dependency in vdsm-* packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review