[Bug 1151464] Review Request: ballerburg - Two players, two castles, and a hill in between

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151464



--- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Christian Dersch from comment #5)
> The package looks nice so far, but you (and upstream) are missing some
> details on licensing. Output of fedora-review license check below, please
> check the following files:
> 
> ballerburg-1.1.0/src/font8x16.h 
> ballerburg-1.1.0/src/sdlgfx.c
> ballerburg-1.1.0/src/sdlgfx.h
> 
> The other "unknown" files are ok, there are short notes that they are GPL.
> (Or they are the matching headers of their GPLed source files). 
> 
> Please clarify the licenses (maybe ask upstream for details), the sdlgfx
> files are not a problem (zlib license), but I cannot see any info in
> font8x16.h

Upstream replied:

The font8x16.h is a generated file, it's font8x16.bmp converted to
source code with "convert font8x16.bmp xbm:font8x16.h". The font bmp
itself is in the public domain, so I'd say the header is in the public
domain, too, so I added a corresponding statement there now.

Upstream commit:
http://git.tuxfamily.org/baller/baller.git/?p=baller/baller.git;a=commitdiff;h=e8257c4c13347f9b048e797227770dea857ffc2c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]