[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317





------- Additional Comments From dennis@xxxxxxxx  2007-04-29 17:41 EST -------
I'm sorry you feel that way.  To give you some perspective of where i'm coming 
from.  say i start some project and fork busybox for my needs and so does 
someone else. with your version we would now have 4 slightly different 
versions of busybox. that means 4 seperate people need to maintain it.  

The reason i suggest  and its not a must just a suggestion that you use the 
fedora busybox. is so that we don't end up with a ton of pretty much the same  
but just a litte different versions of the same package.  You need to submit 
your mindi-busybox package for review.

Please continue to work with us.  

I did a quick check of the package last night.  you are still not using 
disttags as per the guidelines.  you are not allowed to hardcode the disttag 
value. /etc/mindi/ needs to be owned by mindi

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]